Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Timeline Provides Understanding, Guidance to Complicated Health Care Laws
Friday, September 16, 2011
Is Medicaid Too Complex for Americans?
Why is Medicaid so complex? One reason may be due to the fact that Medicaid is a joint state and federal program, and planning to receive (either for you or for a client) this public benefit often involves tax planning, too. Proper Medicaid planning requires an understanding of several complex bodies of law.
While some of these quotes are humorous, it is no laughing matter that Americans, by and large, do not realize that Medicaid is available to the middle class. Protecting assets from long-term care expenses can enable a family to pass an inheritance on to their children that otherwise would not have been available; it allows for the recipient to enjoy an enhanced qualify of life while alive; and it gives peace of mind and security to the family members.
Here is a glance at what the courts have had to say about Medicaid complexity over the last thirty-five years.
1976:
The Second Circuit commented the absurdity of any law or regulation 7 subsections deep. For example:1981:
The United States Supreme Court has called the Medicaid laws:1985:
The Second Circuit calls the Medicaid statute one of:1991:
In a case arising out of Maine, the District Court called Section 1396a(a)17) of the Medicaid statute:1994:
The Fourth Circuit called the Medicaid Act:At this point in time, the laws are so complex that it is recommended that any person contemplating long-term care speak with an experienced elder law attorney.
Image: Master isolated images / FreeDigitalPhotos.net Evan H. Farr on Google +
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
5 Basic Reasons to Consider a Revocable Living Trust
Monday, August 22, 2011
Estate Planning Attorneys Warn About Matching Beneficiaries to Those Named in Your Will or Trust
Evan H. Farr on Google +
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
5 Ways to Ease the Burden When Caring for Kids and Aging Parents
Friday, May 6, 2011
Advocacy Group on New Medicare Hospice Law: “An Issue that Must be Closely Watched”
For families with a loved one currently receiving Hospice care, a new law is under debate and analysis by some advocacy groups. At the very least, they are keeping a close watch on the real-world effect of the law.
The new Medicare Home Health Face-to-Face Requirement is a condition of receiving payment for hospice services. “A physician must order Medicare home health services and must certify a patient’s eligibility for the benefit,” according to Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Moreover, “[before certifying] a patient’s eligibility for the home health benefit . . . [he or she] . . . must document . . . a face-to-face encounter with the patient.”
Why did Congress enact this law? Will the administrative burdens be worthy of debate? The rationale appears to have been; “[to ensure] that the orders and certification for home health services are based on a physician’s current knowledge of the patient’s clinical condition.” What remains unclear is whether Congress is trying to prevent some sort of perceived abuse of the Hospice process, whether Congress perceived physicians as lacking in diligence in this regard, or if it is a means to ensure money is not wasted.
Some groups ARE raising questions. For example, an article recently was published by CMS, entitled, “New Hospice Face-to-Face Requirement: Help or Hindrance?” The group expresses hope that the law will encourage more physician involvement, but also concern that “caring for hospice patients in their third and subsequent certification periods . . . [might become more] . . . difficult and potentially more expensive for providers than caring for patients in their first and second certification periods.” The group ends its article by noting it will continue to watch the issue, so that Medicare beneficiaries who are nearing the end of their lives will not bear any unintended burdens or care shortcomings as a result of this new law.
Image: Sura Nualpradid / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Evan H. Farr on Google +

