Why is Medicaid so complex? One reason may be due to the fact that Medicaid is a joint state and federal program, and planning to receive (either for you or for a client) this public benefit often involves tax planning, too. Proper Medicaid planning requires an understanding of several complex bodies of law.
While some of these quotes are humorous, it is no laughing matter that Americans, by and large, do not realize that Medicaid is available to the middle class. Protecting assets from long-term care expenses can enable a family to pass an inheritance on to their children that otherwise would not have been available; it allows for the recipient to enjoy an enhanced qualify of life while alive; and it gives peace of mind and security to the family members.
Here is a glance at what the courts have had to say about Medicaid complexity over the last thirty-five years.
1976:
The Second Circuit commented the absurdity of any law or regulation 7 subsections deep. For example:“As program after program has evolved, there has developed a degree of complexity . . . regulations which makes them almost unintelligible to the uninitiated . . . [a] draftsman who has gotten himself into a position requiring anything like [§139a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(VIII)(cc)] should make a fresh start.” Friedman v. Berger, 547 F.2d 724 (2nd Cir. 1976).
1981:
The United States Supreme Court has called the Medicaid laws:“an aggravated assault on the English language, resistant to attempts to understand it.” Schweiker v. Gray Panthers, 453 U.S. 34, 43 (1981).
1985:
The Second Circuit calls the Medicaid statute one of:“unparalleled complexity” in DeJesus v. Perales, 770 F.2d 316, 321 (2nd Cir. 1985).
1991:
In a case arising out of Maine, the District Court called Section 1396a(a)17) of the Medicaid statute:“a virtually impenetrable thicket of legalese and gobbledygook.” Lamore v. Ives, 1991 WL 193601 (D.Me.)
1994:
The Fourth Circuit called the Medicaid Act:“one of the most completely impenetrable texts within human experience” and
“dense reading of the most tortuous kind.” Rehab. Association of Virginia v. Kozlowski, 42 F.3d 1444, 1450 (4th Cir. 1994).
At this point in time, the laws are so complex that it is recommended that any person contemplating long-term care speak with an experienced elder law attorney.
Image: Master isolated images / FreeDigitalPhotos.net Evan H. Farr on Google +